Microsoft defends move to disable rival antivirus, cites compatibility issues. Microsoft has come forward and admitted that it does, at times, disable third- party antivirus programs in Windows 1. Kaspersky on exactly this matter. It was last autumn that the security company first began complaining about Microsoft engaging in anti- competitive practices to muscle out third- party antivirus solutions, with Kaspersky specifically noting that when users upgrade Windows 1. ![]() One useful method of troubleshooting startup or software problems is to perform a clean boot. This is a simple method where all third party services and programs are. · When it comes to keeping my PC secure, I rely on a small handful of tools: Windows 7's built-in firewall, Gmail's spam filtering, Web of Trust's helpful. Windows Defender isn’t the best antivirus software (even Microsoft admits its first-party solutions aren’t ideal), but it’s enabled by default on Windows 10 Home. Many HP and Compaq computers with Windows come with Windows Defender. Other HP and Compaq computers might come with free trial versions of other antivirus software. Microsoft’s own Windows Defender.This month, Kaspersky has even gone as far as filing an anti- trust complaint against Microsoft in Europe. . While not addressing this specific issue or Kaspersky directly, as the BBC spotted, Microsoft has made a blog post explaining that in a small percentage of cases, third- party antivirus software can be temporarily disabled in Windows 1.Microsoft observed that antivirus software is often deeply entwined in the guts of the OS, and if it isn’t made fully compatible with a new update to Windows 1.In most cases, antivirus apps are fully compatible – Microsoft notes that 9.Windows 1. 0 machines with a third- party antivirus were fine in the compatibility stakes when it came to the last major upgrade (the Creators Update).But for the small number of apps which weren’t, Microsoft needed to take action, and says it built in a feature to prompt users to install a new (compatible) version of their antivirus post- update. here. ![]() Microsoft explains: “To do this, we first temporarily disabled some parts of the AV software when the update began. We did this work in partnership with the AV partner to specify which versions of their software are compatible and where to direct customers after updating.”Deep dispute. So there you have it – a Windows 1. Which doesn’t sound unreasonable on the face of it, although Kaspersky’s arguments against Microsoft’s practices run pretty deep. The security firm believes that a central problem is the fact that antivirus vendors aren’t given nearly enough time to ensure compatibility of their software with a fresh upgrade of Windows 1. And Kaspersky has further accused Microsoft of various bits of trickery to try to get people to use Windows Defender rather than another security solution, as we discussed last year. It’s a messy issue, for sure, and it’ll be interesting to see Kaspersky’s response to Microsoft’s explanation here.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |